This is where Screech and Frame differ considerably. Screech does what should be done, and Frame just translates everything into English with no significant notations other than the person quoted.
This means, however, that one may prefer one translation over the other based on this alone. For example, one that wishes to take a more scholarly look will likely use Screech or the original , and one that simply wants to read for pleasure may have no problem using the translation by Frame.
Also, Screech is British and Frame is American, so one may have other preferences for style. As for the Physical Copy: The Penguin paperback is thick, but in keeping with the generally small form factor, the print is terribly small, and the paper is of a horrible quality, which is the reason I also purchased the Kindle version. As for the Kindle version: The Penguin Classics Kindle file is much more pleasant to read and deal with than the paperback alternative.
However, there are many errors in the Kindle version that are not present in the paperback version. It appears some items get corrected occasionally, but still, it is not nice to charge so much for the Kindle version, and not have it completely proofread and ready for primetime. This actually lead me to have a conversation with a Penguin representative about the quality of the Kindle version, and in that conversation, I learned something I had not realized before.
Penguin does not produce the Kindle version. So, all of the quality issues I have noticed in the past about Kindle versions essentially are the fault of Amazon rather than the publisher listed.
I suppose the publisher only sells Amazon license to produce the Kindle file and sets price limitations, and Amazon does the rest. This needs to change, because there needs to be more quality control. I have three translations of Montaigne - Cotton, Frame this one and Screech no kidding. The Cotton translation was done in the late 18th century and is some what difficult to read. Screech is more recent and is also quite readable. The Frame volume includes other works by Montaigne such as his travel journals.
Thus, it is more complete than either Cotton or Screech. This volume is over pages and is not very portable. Still I recommend it as being more complete and a little more readable. This is the ONE for those who are ready to dive into the deepend. This is the serious one. Every essay is different and wonderful. My copy has been noted as I have been teaching him. This is done through poetry, historical references, linguistics, theology, imaginary scenarios and intriguing language.
You do not need to know that, hence the enjoyable aspect. His introduction tells you a bit about Montaigne, but it is not that long and can be skipped.
He also explains how he went about translating his version of this collection. If you are looking for something rare or specific, you should look which book it is before purchasing. All of them are available on Amazon.. You might need to write papers with citations. This book is very different than the other books.
It includes citations and the very short Latin and French quotes that he uses, though all of it is translated into English for you. The translations are right next to quotes in parenthesis. If you purchase a different collection, you will have a very difficult time with writing papers because of the varying translations.
Overall, this is a phenomenal read produced by a prolific and prominent man. Screech does a great job. This is the best book of the collections that I have purchased, though it is the most difficult to understand. Again, this collection is more for scholars and academics. Montaigne is studied to this day, nearly as much as Shakespeare because of the sheer difficulty of the paradoxes presented, but, they are enlightening and enjoyable.
In terms of literature, Montaigne is one of the "trickiest" reads he calls himself tricky-- it is a bit of his trademark. The subject of this book is Michel de Montaigne, a 16th century frenchman, famous for writing this book. The topics he covers range from the wisdom of the ancient philosophers to everyday nuisances present in the life of the late 16th century.
The overriding theme throughout is his focus on himself, the only subject he is sure that he knows better than anyone else.
He asks questions that every human finds himself asking at some point. He focuses on ethics and theology and the human soul, and much more. His writing style is relaxing and candid.
The book is broken up into numerous seemingly disjointed sections and can be read for 10 minutes or a couple hours at a time. Montaigne writes in a friendly tone but also covers plenty of serious subjects. This book is unique in providing what life was like for one man who lived over four centuries ago.
One person found this helpful 2 people found this helpful. See all reviews. See all customer images. Most recent customer reviews. Published 15 days ago. Published 1 month ago. I mean I have bought a lot of Published 3 months ago. Published 4 months ago.
Published 5 months ago. Published 6 months ago. Published 8 months ago. Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers. Learn more about Amazon Giveaway. Set up a giveaway. For instance, I hate people who smile all the time. Would you like to try it?
Hemley is being witty here, poking fun at himself and at his overuse of the rhetorical question. I happen to know the author of this essay, and he is a very likable, extremely funny man. Yet he no doubt has his mean moments, times when the things that annoy him lead to testiness or sharp anger.
We all have that side to us, I believe. Hemley is taking a moment in his own essay to explore that aspect of himself, closely and specifically. The essay continues with the author lodging numerous complaints against folks who smile too much in photographs, against the checkout clerk at Walmart, against his kindergarten teacher—and though Hemley continues to leaven his bread of anger with humor and occasional winks to the reader, he does reveal a part of who he is honestly, clearly and with interest.
I tell you this not as aimless revelation but because I want you to know, as you read me, precisely who I am and where I am and what is on my mind. I want you to understand exactly what you are getting: You are getting a woman who for some time now has felt radically separated from most of the ideas that seem to interest other people.
But writers are different. And along the way readers come to an understanding that we are all very much alike. Others form man; I only report him: But is it reason, that being so particular in my way of living, I should pretend to recommend myself to the public knowledge?
Here, Montaigne is addressing a bit of anticipated criticism. In modern parlance, that criticism might go like this: Montaigne, to write about yourself all of the time? I have this, at least, according to discipline, that never any man treated of a subject he better understood and knew, than I what I have undertaken, and that in this I am the most understanding man alive: Montaigne is answering his critics by asserting in my words now, not his: Montaigne, underneath all of the complex sentences and fancy language, is making a simple assertion.
Or, as he puts it elsewhere in the same essay: Memoirist Sue William Silverman often receives letters and e-mail from readers, and recently she shared a fascinating reaction to some of the responses to her first two books, Because I Remember Terror, Father, I Remember You and Love Sick.
Both memoirs frequently elicit this response … even though both books are very different. What does Karen know about me? Karen knows what it was like for me to grow up in an incestuous family. Marie knows what it was like for me to recover from a sexual addiction. To Karen, the real me is one thing; to Marie, the real me is something, someone different. Silverman, of course, is far more than just that.
She is a successful author, a respected teacher, a public speaker, a private person who has had countless challenges and experiences. Everything she has put into her memoirs is true, yes, but then again, neither of her books captures the entire person that she has been and that she is today. To make her point, she talks about an essay she is currently drafting, part of her collection-in-progress, The Pat Boone Fan Club: But I touched upon this incestuous background as briefly as possible, while, at the same time, implementing a much more ironic voice than that of my memoir.
In effect, I removed the dark gray mask I wore while writing the memoir, and, for the essay, slipped on one that had as many sparkles as the red-white-and-blue costume Pat Boone wears in his concerts. Had Silverman the writer attempted to bring her whole identity—her family past, her sexual addiction—into everything she has ever written, she would likely keep writing the same book or same essay over and over, and no one grows as a writer by merely repeating past work.
Silverman is smart enough to know that. Turn your most important personal stories into compelling and meaningful reading experiences for others by considering:
Montaigne: Essays [Michel de Montaigne, John M. Cohen] on 5min-to-money.gq *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Reflections by the creator of the essay form display the humane, skeptical, humorous, and honest views of Montaigne.
Select Essays [Michel de Montaigne, Clive Chafer] on 5min-to-money.gq *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Michel de Montaigne, one of the foremost writers of the French Renaissance and the originator of the genre of the essay.
Buy essay online at professional essay writing service. Order custom research academic papers from the best trusted company. Just find a great help for students in need. Lowest prices, first-rate place and eagerness to work on any type, topic, page count or level of assignment you want. An essay has been defined in a variety of ways. One definition is a "prose composition with a focused subject of discussion" or a "long, systematic discourse". It is difficult to define the genre into which essays fall.
It’s not what happens to us in our lives that makes us into writers; it’s what we make out of what happens to us. It’s our distinctive point of view.